Wednesday, July 25, 2007

Wednesday racing summary

Three losing bets today didn't make for a satisfying reflection on the afternoon of racing. Two finished in runners-up spot, but until the bookmakers change their rules, second don't get paid!

I was planning to bet against Hazy Days at Lingfield if someone would match me at 11/4 The horse had won its debut in a maiden race, but had several questions to answer today - would she improve to win on her handicap debut in a higher class? Would she stay the extra 2 furlongs? Would she handle the soft ground? I thought these were questions to be answered at a low enough price. She was never on offer much below 7/2 and went off at 5/1 so was a 'no bet' in my book, but answer the questions she did! Again, it shows you cannot lay horses at any price, and getting value in your bets, whether backing or laying, is crucial to making a long-term profit.

Tuesday, July 24, 2007

Tuesday racing summary

A small loss of nearly 2 points to the account overall today, due largely to my lay bet scooting up. I had two win bets, with Look Busy coming home in front at a starting price of 2/1 The filly opened at 5/2 and touched 11/4 and higher on the exchanges. I anticipated the price shortening once the markets opened on course, so I took the original 5/2 and that is what will go down on my results.

My lay bet was Speed Song in a class 5 maiden at Yarmouth. She finished 3rd in her debut in a similar event at the beginning of June, and you might expect her to come on for that run. However, I felt the likely even money price was going to be too short - I didn't think she merited a 50% chance of winning in a field of 12 two year-olds. She was on offer at nearly 4/6 odds-on at one point, but I had happily layed to lose 3 points at 1.90 She went and won her race, and backers took my 3 points.

Review of SportsWorld Publishing web site

In a recent readers poll SportsWorld Publishing was voted the best web site for betting products and services. If you haven’t already visited, I thought today I would share a little more about the site.

The SportsWorld site brings together some of the most popular betting books, tipping services, and betting systems, all on the one web site.

Their books include best-sellers such as ‘Trainers4Courses’ by Ken Turrell, ‘The Racing Retirement Plan’ by Bernard Hibbert, and from The Racing Post Expert Series ‘The Definitive Guide To Betting On Horses’.

The site also showcases a portfolio of profitable tipping services, which now includes the ‘Follow The Money’ service, based upon the celebrated system of the same name.

You will find a number of betting systems on offer at SportsWorld, catering not only for horse racing enthusiasts, but also followers of other popular betting sports such as football and tennis.

All told I can see why a great many of you voted this site as the best place to browse for betting products – clearly laid out and easy to navigate, a wide selection of current and proven products, and plenty of special offers.

All the systems and services have been proofed independently, and verifiable results can be supplied upon request from Customer Services.

Why not pay a visit yourself, and take a look? www.SportsWorldPublishing.co.uk

Monday, July 23, 2007

Gone too Fast

More than 6 points profit to show for our efforts today, with a couple of healthy winning bets on both accounts. I suffered three losing bets, including two which finished in the frame. But Danzare was the star of the day, scoring at 7/1 at Yarmouth. He was easy to back nearing the start, and better prices were available on the exchanges.

I had two lay bets this evening at Windsor. Gone Fast was stepping up in class, contesting another maiden race, following her debut. In a race featuring several unknown quantities I felt comfortable laying the horse to lose. However, she produced an improved run to win going away, and took my money away as well. I got it back with interest though, when I successfully laid Marozi for 3 points in the following race.

Sunday, July 22, 2007

Sunday racing summary and weekly results

No movement on the account today, as 2 points gained with a successful lay bet were handed back following two losing back-to-win bets.

I went against Zabougg in the maiden race at Redcar this afternoon. He finished 5th on his debut, and I didn't feel he had showed enough to merit early favouritism this morning. He was sent off at 3/1 after the market changed its mind in favour of Red Cauldron, but there was plenty of 5/2 money available during the course of the day. He finished fourth having never threatened, and saw us two points better off.

It hasn't been a bad week, with five winning bets from fourteen for the Win Bet account, and a little over 3 points profit for the Lay To Lose account. But many opportunities were missed through non-runners and late withdrawals because of the poor weather. The cynical amongst you may argue these could have been losing bets so we should be grateful for this week's profit, and you could have good point! But I would still like to see the sun come out again, the ground to dry out, and reliable racing return to give us some consistent profits, wouldn't you?

Profit for the week: Win Bets 6pts, Lay Bets 3pts

Saturday, July 21, 2007

Mighty Fine profit

The account continues to move in the right direction, albeit slowly with so many bets called off due to the rain (it's July for crying out loud!) I put up five win bets today - the first three were all too short in price so were 'no bets', and the other two were withdrawn and non-runners.

I had two horses to oppose this afternoon. Escape Route was to run in the class 2 handicap over a mile at Newmarket. He was stepping up in class, running a furlong further than ever before on a stiff track, and his only winning form to date was a class 5 maiden. I managed to lay at 5/2 before the price started to drift like a barge, and i must admit I thought we were on to 3 points profit. However, our hopes were dashed as the horse played up behind the stalls and would not go forward. Not starting the race, he goes down as a non-runner and bets are off! Damn! Still, my other lay bet Mighty Fine was duly beaten at Market Rasen.

So, I managed just one point profit for all today's efforts - but a point is still a point, eh?

Friday, July 20, 2007

Rain, rain, go away!

I had four selections lined up for Newbury this afternoon, but the meeting was called off and put pay to our fun! The 10/3 about my lay bet at Newmarket this evening didn't materialise, so that also goes down as a 'no bet'.

I had Winter Sunrise in my sights as a horse to oppose. With just one run under her belt - winning her class 5 maiden - she was giving weight to all but one of her rivals in her handicap debut. She was also stepping up to class 3. To win this evening would require a career best performance, and marked improvement. However, I wanted to get matched at 10/3 or below to justify a bet. The horse produced a great performance to win, but was only ever as low as 7/2 and my price policy was again vindicated - you cannot lay horses at any price and make a profit long term. Even if you think a horse will lose, you must also make a judgement as to what point the risk becomes too great to make it a worthwhile bet.

Even though the weather has been decidedly damp, we keep our powder dry to fight another day.

Thursday, July 19, 2007

Thursday racing summary

The best part of 2 points lost today. I managed to get matched on the winning Starlight Gazer at 5/2 but gave it all back and more with three other losing bets.

I opposed Pentatonic at Folkestone this evening. She was stepping up in both class and distance, and racing off her highest mark to date, yet was still sent off as the 6/5F in a handicap. Fair play to the horse as she continued to improve to score a win, but at such a low price I would lay that kind of bet a hundred times over.

The Single-Most Critical Factor To Making A Profit From Betting On Horse Racing

What is the most important thing you look for when analysing a new system, or a new tipster, and their sets of results?

Do you look for a high strike rate? Perhaps you are looking for a minimum of 30%

Do you look for decent winning prices? Maybe you want an average of at least 3/1

If you don’t already, what you should be doing is COMBINING these two benchmarks to see if you are getting VALUE and hence making a profit.

The only way you will make a profit from betting over the long term is if you consistently back horses at prices HIGHER than their actual chance of winning. In other words, when you get a VALUE price.

Equally, you will make money if you consistently lay bets on horses to lose at prices too LOW when compared to their actual chance of winning. This is how bookmakers have made their money for generations.

For example, if you consistently back horses with a 50% chance of winning, but always back at odds better than evens, you will make a profit. If you back 5/1 (chance) horses at prices of 6/1 then you will make a profit over time.

It’s obvious really, but too many times people get carried away with strike rates, and "never backing odds-on", when both these benchmarks are irrelevant if price does not also come into the equation.

A strike rate of 50% might seem impressive, but if it is achieved with horses at prices less than evens, you will lose money.

If a tipster’s average winning price was 4/5 odds-on, it might on the face of it seem like his tips were very poor value that anyone could pick. But if you learned he had a strike rate of 70% then it’s a different story. He is getting an average price of 4/5 about horses which should be priced at just 3/7 odds-on.

Prices and strike rates are all relative, and intrinsically linked with VALUE

Common misconceptions are that you cannot make money by backing short-priced horses, or that you only make money by selecting horses at higher prices. Both these theories have an element of truth, but need qualifying further for them to be totally true.

Myth #1 : Short-price horses are always poor value

The horse with the shortest price in a race is the favourite, and we all know that if we blindly backed the favourite in every race we would lose money – this is a fact. But the reason we would lose money is because the prices are manipulated by the bookmakers, such that the price of a horse is generally too short compared to its actual chance of winning.

For example, you would expect a horse priced at Even money to win 50% of the time – WRONG!! – in fact even money chances win only around 44% of the time. This is how bookmakers make their profit.

Let me show you how: The even money horse runs 100 races, and we as punters place our bets each time at even money. We will collect from the bookmaker only 44 times, but 56 times the bookmaker will keep our money.

But short-priced horses can still make you a profit – if the price is still too high compared to the chance of the horse winning. For example, a horse at even money is great value if it actually has a 60% chance of winning. You would be getting even money about a horse that should be priced at 4/6

Myth #2 : You can only make a profit by backing higher-priced horses

Of all the horses in a race, the favourite with the shortest price will win the most often – fact. So how can we make money by backing horses further down the market, with better prices. Well, the same theory applies as above – only back horses at a price higher than their actual chance of winning.

If you decide to only back horses at 10/1 but your system produces a strike rate of 8% then you will lose money. If, however, your strike rate is 12% then you will make a profit.

This is because you are backing horses at 10/1 (11.0) when their actual chance of winning is 12% and represented by a price of 8.33. You are getting a price of 11.0 for something that is actually only worth 8.33 – that is why you will profit.

Hopefully you can see that the key to making the profit here, is NOT the 10/1 price alone, nor the 12% strike rate, but getting the two together and achieving VALUE

Higher prices that still do not represent value, will still lead to a loss.

Let me give you an example of how by simply getting a better price about your selections can make the difference between winning and losing money:

Example One:
Zabenz Won 15/8
Briery Fox Lost 7/4
Fire Dragon Lost 6/4
Warlord Won 2/1
Blazing Guns Lost 9/4
Vicario Lost 13/8
Go On Ahead Lost 2/1
Harrowman Lost 15/8
Cloudy Lane Won 11/4
Supreme Prince Lost 13/8

Example Two:
Zabenz Won 2/1
Briery Fox Lost 15/8
Fire Dragon Lost 13/8
Warlord Won 9/4
Blazing Guns Lost 5/2
Vicario Lost 7/4
Go On Ahead Lost 9/4
Harrowman Lost 2/1
Cloudy Lane Won 3/1
Supreme Prince Lost 7/4

What is the difference between the two sets of results above? The same horses ran in the same races, with the same results. Both sets of results have a strike rate of 30%

The difference is in the prices. Each price has been increased by just one notch.

Let’s examine the difference this makes on our return:

In Example One we invest 10 x £100 = £1,000

Our return is £287 + £300 + £375 = £962 so we lose £38

In Example Two we invest the same amount of £1,000

However, our return is now £300 + £325 + £400 = £1,025 so we make a profit of £25

Mathematically, why did we lose money with Example One, yet make a profit with Example Two?

This is why:

In both cases we achieved a strike rate of 30% -- we scored 3 times from 10 attempts -- so our horses had a 30% chance of winning. A 30% chance is represented by a price of 3.33

In Example One the average winning price was the average of 15/8 (2.87), 2/1 (3.00) and 11/4 (3.75) which is 3.21

You can see, we were getting an average price of just 3.21 about horses which should have been priced at 3.33 – the price was too low compared to the actual chance of winning, and that is why we lost money over a series of bets.

In Example Two the average winning price was the average of 2/1 (3.00), 9/4 (3.25) and 3/1 (4.00) which is 3.42

You can see, we were getting an average price of 3.42 about horses which should have been priced at 3.33 – the price was higher when compared to the actual chance of winning, and that is why we made a profit over a series of bets.

How do you get extra value when placing bets?

1) Know what price you want. You wouldn’t go into Tesco’s and ask for a tin of beans, at whatever price the store wanted to charge.

2) If you cannot get the price you want, then do not bet. If you can learn to accept the disappointment of missing the occasional short-priced winner, than you will never have to suffer the pain of a short-priced loser.

3) Bet on the exchanges. Prices on the exchanges are typically 20% higher than those offered by high street bookmakers. Check out sites such as Betfair, Betdaq, and WBX World Bet Exchange.

Follow this link for Betfair www.reddracing.co.uk/betfair
Follow this link for Betdaq www.reddracing.co.uk/betdaq
Follow this link for WBX www.reddracing.co.uk/wbx

4) Post and forget your bets on the exchanges. No more sitting in front of your PC waiting for a price. Post your request for the price YOU want on a betting exchange, and you can walk away knowing that if your price is matched you have gotten a value bet – if it isn’t matched your bet will be cancelled and your money returned. You are in control of the price, not the bookmaker.

In Summary

The key lesson I want people to learn from this article is to gain the discipline of seeking value in any bets they place. If you find no value, then keep your money safe and watch the race. If you can learn to risk your money only when you have the prospect of a satisfactory return, then you will elevate yourself from 98% of punters who continue to lose money.

If you are a member of my service, pay attention to my advised prices, and only bet when you can get these prices. When I reach a 100% strike rate, only then should you bet at any price(!!) – until then you owe it to yourself to get VALUE

Recommended Reading....

The Value Horse Method is a fully comprehensive guide which will show you how to find the value bets in any race-card. Many professional gamblers, myself included, regularly practice the teachings in this guide to produce consistent profits and income. Visit www.reddracing.co.uk/vhm to find out more.

Wednesday, July 18, 2007

Wednesday racing summary

There are clear blue skies this evening in Tring, and today's results also had a much sunnier outlook than of late. So far this month we have had to endure miserable weather, and so far as backing horses has been concerned, miserable returns as well.

I had three back-to-win bets and two of these returned winning profits. Kunte Kinteh and Sashenka won at 15/8 and 13/8 respectively, with better prices available throughout the day on the exchanges.

Today's only lay bet was against Ossman at Uttoxeter. The horse had yet to achieve a win, having run several times in handicap company, and now quite exposed. Running again over the trip of 3 miles, yet with tacky going underfoot this time, I felt he would struggle. The booking of Tony McCoy gave punters a reason to pile on, and the price duly tumbled - much to the layers' delight, and ours. He weakened in the finishing straight, and gave us 3 points profit into the bargain. The lay bets continue to perform at an outstanding level of 95% this month - and remember we are laying race favourites, so this level of success is truly extraordinary. Just as well, as by contrast the Win Bets are currently in need of the support!

More than 7 points profit to add to the bottom line today.

Tuesday, July 17, 2007

Tuesday racing summary

A quiet day with only one bet available at suitable odds. Chasing Memories could only finish third at Beverley, so a solitary point lost from the account.

Monday, July 16, 2007

Hoping Imperial Mint would suck

Overall a profitable day, producing more than 4 points profit. My four win bets returned two winners in Ruby Dante and Northern Dare.

This evening saw my winning run laying favourites come to an end after nine successful bets and 17 points profit. Imperial Mint was contesting his second ever race, a maiden stakes. He was stepping up in class, and over an unproven soft surface, having run on good ground previously. I took an early price of 11/8 and subsequently the market also had second thoughts about the horse as his price drifted out to 15/8F On this occassion I was wrong, and the horse produced a good performance to win. But if we can consistently lay bets like this, under Starting Price, we will be guaranteed long-term profits.

Tuesday, July 10, 2007

Tuesday racing summary

I'm enduring a losing run at the moment, and my last successful win bet came ten selections back. I came within a few inches of breaking the cycle when Yossi was called second in a photograph at Pontefract this afternoon - but second is not a winner.... A further losing bet meant 2 points lost for the afternoon.

Neither of my lay bets materialised. I was planning a big 6 point bet against Braddock, also at Pontefract. Granted he was unbeaten after three runs, but today he was making a significant jump in class, trying a distance for the first time, and carrrying a 7lb penalty for his last win. Yet he was still a short-priced favourite to win this morning, and that is why I was happy to lay bets against him. It was all academic by the time the race went off, as he was pulled out of the race and a Non-Runner. I also proposed Ancient Culture in the following race, but the price of 15/8 was never available to lay, so that too goes down as a 'no bet'.

WBX the new alternative to Betfair

If you are taking advantage of the better value to be had with exchange betting, or you regularly lay bets on horses to lose, please, please do not make the mistake of limiting yourself to an account with Betfair.

Whilst Betfair has been the pioneer of exchange betting in this country, and is arguably the best betting exchange site, you will find yourself missing opportunities if you have just the one exchange account.

Until recently, the only alternative to Betfair has been Betdaq. But now WBX has emerged as another viable alternative to Betfair as an exchange betting channel. Although Betfair is still the benchmark market leader, with the highest liquidity (more money and punters in their markets), it is still very useful to have comparative prices available.

So we have Betfair, Betdaq, and now WBX to choose from. But why bet with WBX?

Who are WBX? Launched in 2006, WBX is the trading name of the World Bet Exchange Limited, which is part of the WBX Group of Companies. WBX is a global bet exchange, operating from the UK, one of the most progressive gaming jurisdictions in the world.

WBX is a true global exchange, where Members receive better odds, special offers and a wide choice of international betting opportunities in one of the safest and most secure betting environments available anywhere in the world. With a combination of unique proprietary technology and a user-friendly interface, Members can browse the WBX website, offering and accepting odds, all from the comfort of their own home. Members are also provided with access to a multi-lingual help desk that provides support via phone and email.

To provide maximum security, Member funds are ring-fenced in a separate bank account within a separate company. WBX has appointed PKF (http://www.pkf.co.uk/), one of the UK’s leading independent accounting and advisory firms, to regularly audit these funds. PKF will provide assurance statements on WBX’s website to ensure that any future liabilities are always met in full. For a whole new world of betting try WBX – World Bet Exchange

Open a WBX account today

Monday, July 09, 2007

Kirkbys Treasure is just fools gold

Two points lost to the account today, as both my win bets failed to provide any returns. Risque Heights was unplaced at Musselburgh, and later in the afternoon Kirkbys Treasure could only place third.

I proposed just the one lay bet. Careenya was running in the selling race at Bath. I always question the motive a trainer has when a horse makes its debut race in a seller - it surely cannot be a sign the trainer has great confidence in the horse? However, the market also had its doubts, and the price was always too high to make a worthwhile bet.

Sunday, July 08, 2007

Sunday racing summary and weekly results

Just the two bets today, both back-to-win, and sadly both unsuccessful.

This past week has seen me return a small loss for the Win Bets. By contrast the Lay Bets have gotten the month off to a good start, with 13 points profit and so far a 100% success rate.

Profit for the week: Win Bets 0.5pts loss, Lay Bets 13pts

Saturday, July 07, 2007

Saturday racing summary

Attempting to select horses to win is a bit like walking on egg-shells at the moment. The abnormal soft going on most courses is playing havoc with the form book and I am only comfortable putting a few selections forward, in order to reduce liabilities.

Having said that I had 5 win bets yesterday, and found 2 winners in Champagne Shadow and Scintillo. But only two win bets today, and both failed to score.

I more than compensated for these two points lost, with a successful bet against Mutanaseb at Sandown. As there were several negative pointers against this horse, I was happy to endure high liabilities (4 points at 9/2) as I felt as sure as I could be that he would have to show marked improvement to win. He was stepping up in class to a class 2 Heritage Handicap. He was stepping up in trip, and the handicapper had saddled him with an extra 7lbs for his last win. The tacky going and stiff track at Sandown would only compound his disadvantage, and he finished fourth.

On balance a 2 point profit for the day.

Thursday, July 05, 2007

Thursday racing summary

A loss of a point to the account today. Both my win bets were unsuccessful, but I gained a point back with a successful lay bet this evening.

Trafalgar Day had been raised 9lbs for his win in a similar handicap event last time out, and I felt the soft going today would compound this penalty and ultimately get the better of him. He finished third.

Golden Rules Of Betting For National Hunt Horse Racing

How do you avoid doing your money when betting on National Hunt horse racing? By definition jumps racing brings with it additional risk every time your horse leaves the ground. Making a profit from punting over the sticks is treacherous enough without falling for the bookmakers’ seductive bets which often leave the unwary punters pot-less.

So to help you swerve those rushes of blood to the head I have devised a set of National Hunt punting rules. Sticking to these rules may mean you miss a few winners throughout the season, and although you may not win a fortune by following them, they will probably stop you from losing one. We’ll leave that to the less-savvy punters shall we?

If you have a passion for horse racing, then for pure exhilaration there can be nothing quite as spectacular as seeing thirty or forty horses thunder off across the Melling Road at the start of the Grand National. Or perhaps you marvel at the athletic prowess of the winner of the Cheltenham Gold Cup as they stretch clear of the field up the hill towards the finish line at Prestbury Park?

Traditionally the National Hunt jumps racing season would start around early November and carry on throughout the winter months. The climax of the season is still the Cheltenham Festival in March, with the Grand National in April at Aintree.

Today you will find national hunt meetings pretty much all year round, and although the summer meetings are thinner on the ground and lower key, there still exists the opportunity to profit from horses racing over obstacles.

Here are my Golden Rules for betting on National Hunt horse racing:

Rule #1
When the rains come in the deep mid-winter, and the going turns proper heavy, look out for horses who have already demonstrated form in these kind of conditions. In reality, not many horses actually enjoy galloping through mud. If you can uncover a horse which relishes testing ground – even if the price suggests they are something of an outsider, and with recent form figures reading like a row of duck eggs – you may well be sitting on a good value bet.

Rule #2
This rule is about horses who are taking a step up to race in a better class of race and at one of the more imposing tracks. Where you have a number of steeplechasers, who are already performing well in quality races at the top tracks, it is easy to over-estimate the chances of a ‘live’ outsider who jumps well and won last time out, albeit in a lower grade race at a provincial track. In these situations, it is often better to lump on the fancied horses along with everyone else. Admittedly this will often result in poor value prices at the top of the market, and the profitable move may well be to keep your money safe, and sit these races out.

Rule #3
As an addendum to the last Rule, this one is so simple, but none-the-less true. When you are trying to pick winners at Cheltenham, and especially at the festival in March, it pays dividends to give extra merit to those runners who have already shown winning form around this unique race-course. If a horse has managed to win here, they should be credited with a real chance to triumph again.

Rule #4
A long-standing myth that two-and-a-half-mile chasers possess the best characteristics to win the Grand National is utter rubbish. Why? Well, for starters the Grand National is staged over more than FOUR miles. Find a horse who can stay forever, and who jumps for fun, and you will have a horse capable of winning the greatest steeple-chase in the world.

Rule #5
Let’s imagine you have narrowed down your selections in a jumps race to just two horses. One is piloted by a top-20 jumps jockey, and the other is ridden by a less-able jockey who gets to claim a weight allowance over his rivals. In this situation my advice would be to choose the professional every time. In Flat races, a weight advantage of a few pounds can make all the difference, and trainers will often make clever use of talented apprentice riders to gain a competitive edge. Over the sticks however, it will often pay to side with the proven skills of the experienced horseman, even if it means sacrificing a little weight to your rivals. After all, they are a winning jockey for a reason.

Rule #6
A horse who turns in a fine performance at a flat, easy or ‘fast’ track may not necessarily produce the same performance at a more testing race-course. To me this seems one of the most obvious statements when studying National Hunt form, but it is one that punters ignore time and again, getting their fingers burnt in the process. If a horse has jotted up an impressive sequence of wins at easy tracks such as Musselburgh, Fakenham, Hereford, Taunton, Southwell, and Aintree’s Mildmay course, they should not necessarily be considered a ‘steering job’ when they contest a race at a course with a more testing profile. Of particular note should be courses with an uphill finish such as Cheltenham, Sandown Park, Hexham, Carlisle, and the daddy of finishes at Towcester.

Rule #7
There exists an old maxim which says “never bet odds-on in a novice chase”. This rule needs modifying slightly. If such a short price is based solely upon a horse’s hurdling form, then in the long-run you would be wise to steer clear. When a horse is tackling the bigger obstacles in public for the first time, it is not the time to lump on with all your ‘hard-earned’ without the prospect of at least doubling your money. However, if the horse has already shown some decent ability over fences (boasting a win or perhaps finishing close up in a previous novice chase) then its chances of winning as an odds-on shot are probably no better or worse than in any other kind of race.

Rule #8
One of the biggest betting minefields in jumps racing is when top-flight horses are on the comeback trail after injury. This is precisely when to treat horses with caution, but all too often punters will jump right in and throw this caution, and their money, to the wind. It is very difficult for a trainer to bring a top horse back into a high-grade contest at the same level of form as before the horse suffered an injury. Yet just because a horse is seen once again on a race-track, many punters will expect to see this kind of form repeated first time out. Bookmakers will take advantage of this high-expectation and keep prices short – based purely upon the animal’s reputation and historic form. But the low prices are not a true reflection of the horse’s actual chance of winning on the day. In these instances it may well be more prudent to watch and learn, to gauge the horse’s level of fitness. Alternatively, the shrewd punter will take advantage of punters plunging on the false favourite, and seek value in one of the other runners.

Rule #9
During the course of the jumps season there are several two mile handicap hurdles with bountiful pots of prize money. Finding the winner in these races is incredibly difficult, as they tend to be over-subscribed and doggedly competitive down to the money and prestige on offer. Similar to the big-field summer handicaps on the Flat, it seems horses often land these races in turn. Consequently, the cautious punter will reduce his stakes on these races to a minimum. A more fruitful avenue to take would be to concentrate upon the longer handicap hurdle races run over three miles plus. These stamina-sapping contests are more likely to be won by distance specialists who have already proved they can stay the longer trip. Winning stayers have a habit of cropping up in these distance handicaps time and again.

Rule #10
Finally, the clue is in the name, and this sport of kings is called jumps racing. If you can spot the true equine athletes who bend their back and jump seemingly for fun, tackling obstacles with relish, then you will unearth a plentiful seam of winners over time. Equally, beware of the self-styled ‘experts’ who declare “he may not be a fluent hurdler now, but he is shaping to be a fine chaser in the future”. In reality, the chances are he will be just as poor, if not worse, over the larger, less forgiving fences.

I hope that by following some or all of these rules, you can begin to think a little more outside the box, distance yourself from the madding crowd, and take some money back off those bookies during the otherwise gloomy winter months.

Wednesday, July 04, 2007

Fromsong on song

An extremely satisfying day today, which put nearly 8 points profit on the bottom line. I had four win bets, and two winners, including Fromsong this evening at Kempton. He was sent off at 11/4 but you could have taken anything up to 7/2 on the exchanges.

I also had two lay bets this evening, and both were overturned. Salsa Verdi was contesting her second ever race - a maiden fillies stakes. She produced a good performance to finish runner-up first time out, but I saw no emphatic reason to suggest she would walk away with today's race, especially over the longer trip, and with several debutants with unknown potential in the race. I knew the price would take a tumble with the booking of Mr Dettori and I went against her for 3 points. She finished 3rd behind two of the 'unknowns'.

Tuesday, July 03, 2007

Tuesday racing summary

A good day at the office (as it were) with three win bets producing two winners, and two race favourites successfully overturned. Kenmore and Artdeal came home in front. Granted the prices were nothing to write home about, but with just one loser, a profit of over three points from three bets is ample in anybody's book.

Sign Of The Cross was stepping up in class at Thirsk this evening. The soft ground was an added 'spanner' to throw into the works, and I was happy to lay bets for 2 points. The colt finished 4th of seven.

So by the time I packed up for home I was more than 6 points better off.

Monday, July 02, 2007

Monday racing summary

The unpredictable ground is still limiting opportunities on the back-to-win side, and leading to higher prices and less value on the lay-to-lose side. As a result I only had two bets today, both to win, and both lost. It will take a few days (and an end to the rain) for the ground to revert to normal, so in the meantime we should expect a lot less action than we might be used to.

Sunday, July 01, 2007

Sunday racing summary and weekly results

It's the first day of July and the Great British Summer has put pay to the meetings at Salisbury and Windsor - abandoned due to water-logged courses, would you believe! So nothing to report today.

The week as a whole saw an acceptable return of just over 5 points profit from the Win Bets. The Lay Bets finished the month with six successful bets from six, and 7 points profit to add to the coffers.

Profit for the week: Win Bets 5pts, Lay Bets 7pts